Custom software development is not just about code, programmers and technologies. It is primarily about solving specific problems in the company. And for the solution to work, the developer must first understand what the company really needs.
However, this does not mean that you have to master IT terminology or know exactly what the software should look like. It is enough if you can describe what is holding you back today, where errors occur or what should work better.
Why the way you communicate matters
Why is good communication more important than you think?
- Poor assignment = poor solution. If a developer receives inaccurate or unclear information, they will improvise. The result? Software that may technically work, but does not solve what you expected.
- Unclear points lead to delays. The more question marks there are during development, the more additional adjustments and deadline shifts there will be.
- Every development project costs something. And every inaccuracy or change in the assignment means additional costs.
Good news: You do not need to speak “their” language
A developer does not need a technical specification from the client. They need to understand the real needs of the company. And you can describe those best through specific situations, problems and expectations.
Ask yourself these questions, for example:
- Where do the biggest delays arise in everyday work?
- Which activities are repeated and could be automated?
- What mistakes are repeated often and what causes them?
- Which information do you always need to have available quickly and reliably?
Technology solves problems, but only those it knows
Software is not born from code, but from understanding. If you can name what does not work ideally in the company, and what should be different, you are ready to communicate effectively with a software partner even without an IT dictionary.
The most common communication misunderstandings between the company and IT professionals
One of the most common reasons why software development does not run smoothly is the different perception of what was said and what was understood. The company says one thing, the developer imagines another, and the result often does not meet the expectations of either side.
Company: “We want it like Excel, but nicer.”
Developer: “Should it be a visual editor with a spreadsheet interface? Or a database with links between data? Should it synchronize with the existing Excel file?”
Result: The delivered solution does not cover what the company had in mind, because the original assignment was too vague.
Company: “We want a simple CRM.”
Developer: “Simple as in recording contacts? Or also with a sales process, invoicing, support?”
Result: The delivered system either cannot do what the company expected, or it is too complex and unnecessarily overpriced.
Where do the most common misunderstandings arise?
- Vagueness and imprecision: Terms such as “simple”, “fast”, “like a Google form” can mean something different to everyone.
- Excessive technicality: Companies try to speak “the language of developers” and use terms they do not understand and often use incorrectly.
- Missing context: The developer knows what the software should do. But they often do not know why the company needs it, and that can be key.
- Unspoken expectations: “We considered that obvious.” A sentence that always appears when it is already too late.
How to avoid these problems?
Describe the problems you want to solve, not technical solutions.
- Instead of: “We want a REST API with JSON output.”
- Try: “We need our warehouse to be able to load data from the invoicing system.”
Explain the context of use:
- Who will use the system?
- When and how often?
- Which data is most important to you?
Do not be afraid to admit what you do not know. IT specialists are used to asking follow-up questions. What matters is that you are open and specific.
It is not about learning to “speak like an IT specialist”. The goal is to learn to talk about your company, processes and problems in a way that the developer understands and can turn them into a functional solution.
Start with the problem, not the feature
One of the biggest differences between a successful and a problematic software project is the way a company formulates its requirements. In practice, a sentence such as this is heard very often: “We need button X,” “We want module Y,” “Make us an application for Z.” But that is not an assignment, it is only an idea of a solution. And that idea may be (often unknowingly) incorrect, ineffective or unnecessarily expensive.
An experienced developer does not need to know what button you want, but why you want it.
Why “feature-based assignments” are a dead end
When a company starts by describing specific functionalities, it puts itself in the role of solution designer without having technical or process perspective. The result tends to be software that may meet the “wish list”, but does not solve the real problem or solves it only partially.
Typical consequences of this approach:
- the software is unnecessarily complicated,
- it contains features that are not used in practice,
- additional adjustments arise that make the project more expensive,
- users feel that the system “works against them”.
The right start: describe reality, not the solution
It is much more effective to start with what is happening in the company today and what is not working ideally. An IT specialist can then design a solution that is simpler, cheaper and often also technically cleaner than what you would design yourself.
Practical comparison:
❌ “We want an employee management application.”
✅ “Every month, we spend two working days processing attendance manually. Data is copied from papers into Excel and mistakes often occur. We need to speed up this process and make it clearer.”
❌ “We need export to PDF.”
✅ “We send offers to customers manually and often use old versions of documents. We want to be sure that they always receive an up-to-date and correct offer.”
In the second case, the IT specialist understands the goal. And when they understand the goal, they can design a solution that fulfils it not only on paper, but also in practice.
A tool for companies: ask the right questions
Before you start talking about software, try to answer these questions:
- Which process currently takes us the most time?
- Where do mistakes arise that cost us money or nerves?
- Which activities do people do repeatedly and manually?
- Who works with the system every day and what bothers them most about the work?
- What would have to change for us to say: “This works better than before”?
These answers are more valuable for an IT specialist than any list of technical features.
A change of perspective that saves time and budget
When a company stops asking “what features do we want” and starts asking “what problem do we want to solve”, the entire course of the project changes. The assignment is clearer, solutions are more targeted and development is less “inflated”.
Software should serve the business, not the other way around. And the first step towards that is to name the problem in the language of reality, not technology.
How to prepare inputs for an IT specialist
Without a good assignment, even the best IT specialist will not create good software.
Many companies enter a software project with a very vague idea of what they actually need. Instead of first clarifying which processes they want to improve and why, they start by describing “technical” requirements that often do not reflect the real needs of the business.
If you want the developer to understand you, you do not need to know programming. You need to be clear about your processes. And know how to describe them understandably.
What to prepare before the first meeting
1. List of processes you want to address
You do not need to describe them in detail. It is enough to state what their purpose is, how they work and why they matter to you.
Example:
- Recording customer orders
- Issuing invoices
- Managing complaints
- Warehouse records
2. Who performs these processes and how they work today
People who work with systems every day are often forgotten. From their perspective, it becomes clear what works in reality and what does not.
- Who performs the given process? (e.g. salesperson, accountant, warehouse worker)
- What do they do it in today? (e.g. Excel, paper, e-mail)
- What slows them down, what do they have to handle manually?
3. Problems and delays that bother you
This is the most important part of the assignment. Focus on reality, not hypotheses:
- Where do errors or typos arise?
- Which tasks are repeated and take too much time?
- What most often causes delays or client dissatisfaction?
4. Goals: what should be improved, accelerated or simplified
This is not about describing the solution, but the expected effect:
- We want invoicing to take minutes, not hours
- We want to reduce the number of errors in orders
- We need to have an overview of the status of jobs in one place
Why it is worthwhile
If you prepare this information in advance, you will get:
- a faster solution proposal (the developer does not have to find out details later),
- a more accurate estimate of price and time,
- a lower risk of misunderstandings and additional costs,
- a system that solves real problems, not only the ones you “thought” you had.
Communication with a developer is not about technology, it is about process. When you give them a clear view of your everyday reality, they will help you design a solution that is functional, simple and meaningful. The resulting software will then not be a “technology project”, but a tool that truly moves your company forward.
You do not need to know “how”, it is enough to know “what” and “why”
Your role is not to design software, but to explain what it should solve and why it is important to you.
One of the common mistakes in companies that commission software development is trying to come straight away with their own solution. For example, they say: “We want module X with button Y, which generates document Z.” However, this approach often leads to an unnecessarily complicated, inefficient system, because designing the solution is not your role.
Your role is to describe reality. The more precisely you can explain to the IT specialist what you need and why you need it, the better solution they can design for you.
What you should know (and say)
Focus on these three questions:
What should the software do?
For example: “We want to have an overview of all received orders, who is handling them and what status they are in.”
Who is it intended for?
For example: “The warehouse worker and the sales department will work with the system. They need to get to order information quickly.”
Why is it important?
For example: “Today this information gets lost in e-mails, which causes errors and delays. Customers are then dissatisfied.”
How to explain it when you are not sure?
If you are not clear about the wording, you do not need to panic. An excellent aid is to describe a specific working day or typical situation.
Try to think about:
- What exactly does a specific employee do?
- What tools do they work with?
- What works well for them and what does not?
- When do they feel frustrated or delayed?
Practical example:
“Our accountant manually copies data about received orders from e-mail into the invoicing system every month. It takes her a whole day. In addition, it often happens that something is wrong and the invoice has to be corrected. We want this data to be transferred automatically.”
Such a description tells the developer much more than the sentence: “We need to connect e-mail with the invoicing system.”
You do not need to know technological solutions, integration protocols or database names. It is enough to know what problem you are solving, who it concerns and why it bothers you. The developer is there to find a way to help you, but without your inputs it will not be a system for you, but for someone else.
What should a good assignment look like?
- Naming the problem
Describe what does not work today, causes delays or unnecessarily complicates work. - Context
Explain how the process works today, who works with it and why it is a problem. - Goal
Say what should change and what benefit you expect from it.
Comparison: vagueness vs. specificity
❌ “We need digital transformation.”
Such an assignment says nothing about what the software should specifically solve.
✅ “We want to automate the approval of orders, which currently takes place by e-mail and sometimes takes up to 3 days. We need the approver to receive a notification and be able to decide with one click whether to approve the order.”
This already tells the IT specialist what process the software should replace, who will work with it and what the outcome should be.
Other examples of well-formulated assignments:
✅ “Today we have to issue invoices manually based on data from Excel. We would like a simple form where the salesperson enters the data and the system generates the invoice automatically.”
✅ “We want the sales team to have access to an overview of all current jobs in one place. At the moment they are scattered across e-mails and everyone keeps track of them in their own way.”
✅ “We need employees to be able to request vacation through the system and the manager to approve it without e-mailing back and forth.”
Practical aid: A simple assignment structure
- What are we solving?
A brief description of the problem or obstacle in the current process. - Who works with it?
Who are the users? What skills do they have? What do they expect from the system? - How does it work today?
In what way is the current system or method unsuitable? - What do we want to achieve?
What is the goal, ideally expressed also in terms of time or work savings.
You do not need to prepare a specification as if for a public tender. It is enough if you can clearly explain:
- what is holding you back today,
- who it concerns,
- and what the outcome should be.
The IT specialist will help you translate these requirements into a technical solution, but a good assignment is your ticket to making the result actually work.
Clear communication saves time, money and nerves
Good software does not arise only at the programmer's keyboard. It starts in the company with a clear naming of problems, open communication and specific goals. You do not need to know technical terminology, know how to write specifications or know the difference between backend and frontend. But what you do need is to be able to answer questions such as:
- What causes delays or errors for us today?
- Where is time or overview lost in the processes?
- What would significantly help us at work?
If you know these answers, you can be an excellent partner for an IT specialist. Not because you tell them how to do something, but because you tell them why you need it. That is where the key to a high-quality result lies.
Summary of key points:
- Do not start with the solution, but with the problem.
- Do not describe functionality; describe the reality of your everyday work.
- Prepare your inputs: processes, responsible people, main obstacles.
- Be specific and factual, not technical.
- Maintain an ongoing dialogue during development.
A good IT specialist will never judge you based on whether you speak the “right IT language”. On the contrary, they will appreciate that you know your company, can name what is holding you back, and have a clear idea of where you want to move. Thanks to that, the software itself will be not only functional, but truly useful.